Drexel Meethoule-Twad, Struller's lawyer elaborated on the legal merits of the case at a press meeting Tuesday, “In Nevada, this constitutes malpractice the same way a botched surgery does: A professional recommends a painful, often humiliating procedure that will make the 'patients' life easier or more fulfilling, and after the procedure is complete, the results are just not there.” He then held up a picture of the post-Queer Eye Struller. “My client is more miserable and unfuckable now than he ever has been. The damage to his reputation is so profound that he may have to move to another city to regain his dignity: This is NOT what Mr. Struller signed up for.”
 
The lawsuit asks for $25,000 in damages and $200,000 for pain and suffering.
 
Struller, a masonry contractor and single father, said the suit is only fair. “I don't want to get rich off this, I just want to buy back my El Camino, get some real clothes, some functional furniture, and be able to move away from Reno....My life here is over thanks to Queer Eye. I think it is fair to make them pay for me and my kids to start over elsewhere.”
 
Representitives of Bravo and Queer Eye declined any further comment than the following short statement:  “This suit is ridiculous. We will fight it tooth and nail. If Mr. Struller can't handle his new fabulous look, that's his problem, honey.”
 
The case will hit the courts sometime next month.

Written by Faux-Newz Staff Writer
Tom Cox